People who argue against contraceptive coverage fall into three categories:
- Those who are against ALL drug coverage, but make the mistake of focusing on contraceptives.
- Those who don't want any of their money to go to subsidized contraceptives for parasites who are probably irresponsible sluts.
- Those who follow religious tenets against the use of contraceptives.
For category #3 people, I have to argue that their church's tenets are misguided and/or outdated in this age where we have over 7 billion people thronging the Earth. Also, they cannot and should not force their church teachings on employees. Do they make their employees swear religious oaths? No. So keep religion out of healthcare also.
But a lot of religion tenets come down to category #2, which is disapproval of sex. Often it's clothed as disapproval of wanton, irresponsible sex, but when you scratch the surface, it's a general disapproval of sex.
Image: politicalfun.blogspot.com
However, it makes no sense for this disapproval of wanton sex to apply also to contraceptives. These are used mostly by very responsible people for responsible purposes. Just because prostitutes and sexually adventurous people also use contraceptives, that doesn't make contraceptives evil. Prostitutes and the unchaste also drink water for the same reasons the rest of us do, but we don't have religious prohibitions against water.
So there's no logical reason to deny contraceptive coverage--unless I've missed some other argument. If that's the case, I apologize. However, I really doubt that there is any other argument.
Slut or responsible person?
No comments:
Post a Comment